ESTA PÁGINA NÃO SERÁ TRADUZIDA
By way of confirmation avid problem still exists with WP CU-SeeMe Ver 3.1.1 Build 004, releasedMarch 30th 1998, I received the following response from A WP Technician;when I asked him if the original 3.1 Build 25 bug had beenresolved (which involved going in and out of certain verisons of WP reflectorsoftware and apparently disguised problems with Cornell and Godette's Enhanced reflectors as a result. )
Subject: Re: Ver 3.1.1
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 1998 11:13:50 -0400
From: YYYYYY@wpine.com (YYYYYYY) (Sanitized for protection)
To: XXXXX
Dear (Sanitized for protection);
This was our main reasonfor version 3.1.1 we are very certain that this
is no longer the case. However if you are connecting to CornellReflectors
or the Enhanced Reflector, then there may still be problems. Theseproblem
are fully documented in the release notes and should give all the
information we have at this time. If you find this to be otherwiseplease
eMail me so that I might look into this further.
YYY Y.
At 10:17 AM 4/20/98 -0400, you wrote:
>YYY, you were kind enough to helpwith a response to my question
>regarding the effect of High Receive rates in a reflector....Iwas
>wondering if I could impose one more time?
>
>There seems to be alot of discussion regarding ver 3.1.1 and whetheror
>not the WP Reflector Compatibility issue has been resolved in this
>latest release....IE, supposedly you still have to re-boot afterleaving
>a WP reflector before entering another WP reflector or there isno vid
>reception.
>
>Thanks YYY!
>
>Sincerely
>(Sanitzed for protection)
In addition, please check our FAQs at http://support.wpine.com/cuseeme/for
answers to common questions.
_________________________________________________________
YYY YYYYY
White Pine Software
CUSeeMe Technical Support
542 Amherst Street
Nashua, NH 03063
(603) 886-9050
WWW: http://www.wpine.com
East coast support line: (603) 594-2804 8am - 8pm EST
_________________________________________________________
Dear (Sanitzed for protection)
Thank-you for your support of Cu-SeeMe. First the Receptionrate does not
usually cause any degradation of video signals and if it is youshould
mearly lower the Max Recieve within your reflector configuration.I would
only suggest this however if your using a smaller amount of bandwidthsuch
as an ISDN. It would be simpler though to upgrade to the MPCS (Meeting
Point Conference Server) which has built in bandwidth managmentand would
cut back as it saw the need.
As far as the v3.1 client problems sending video, it appearsthat this is
due to an error within the client itself. We are working on a fixfor this
and expect a new release sometime in April.
Yours Truly,
YYY YYYYY
At 11:43 AM 3/15/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Problem: Good Day:
>
>Two questions please:
>
>1). What is the effect of high RECEIVE rates on bandwidth?...Thatis, if one
>user is set to high receive rates (say above 28 to 56k) does itaffect
>vid reception to others in the reflector, slow vid, degrade vid,etc?
>Transmit rates are obvious, but this seems to be an on-going discussion
>at the moment. With the trend to high speed modems and cable, friction
>seems to be on the increase if somone has high reception rates.
>
>2). What is the work-around or patch for the Build 25 compatibilityissue
>with some versions of WP Reflector Software (and which versionof WP
>Reflector software are causing the video stall?)
>
>As a Reflector Monitor, I and many of our users would appreciateyour
>response.
>
>Thank you.
>
>____________________________________________
>
>
In addition, please check our FAQs at http://support.wpine.com/cuseeme/for
answers to common questions.
_________________________________________________________
YYY YYYY
White Pine Software
CUSeeMe Technical Support
542 Amherst Street
Nashua, NH 03063
(603) 886-9050
WWW: http://www.wpine.com
East coast support line: (603) 594-2804 8am - 8pm EST
_________________________________________________________
